I don't understand this...

Symphony-x · Orange Belt

...But, In Boxing, KBoxing, MT, whatever... why do many people only learn to fight in one stance, IE Right or Left [or south paw... whatever]?

I personally believe in learning/training in both stance, not only does it get my skill level; up, but switching around in fights can confuse oppenents etc...

Anyway, What are peoples opinions on this, and what do you train as left, right or both?

Thanks
_________________
Willing - Believing - Achieving

Orange Belt: Freestyle/Sport Karate - Kickboxing - Boxing

gzk · Blue Belt

I train with a right hand/orthodox stance. I would guess that training in both is uncommon because while it can mess up your opponent, it can also mess you up; it makes keeping your balance harder, it can make your responses a little slower, make ranging more difficult, etc. For all the opponent-confusing value it has, you still have to land good shots and avoid those of your opponent. Having said all that, I do think training in your non-preferred stance to some degree is a good idea, just in case you ever find the need to use it.
_________________
Battling biomechanical dyslexia since 2007

bushido_man96 · KF Sensei

I like to train from both sides. I have seen people start switching their stances when I switch, so I like to mess with them.

_________________
Success is where preparation meets opportunity.

www.chiefswarpath.com

IcemanSK · Purple Belt

I think the reason it's taught to focus on one stance is the idea of putting your power side in the back. (If your right handed, you'll generate more power if your left foot is forward). I think a lot of boxing trainers feel that "switching" is a waste of time and energy. Given the confines of the rules of boxing, learning to switch would mean changing focus (ie. doubling your workout). Most trainers would consider that unproductive.

In the era of MMA (where fighters are in many different positions) learning to fight on both sides is much more valueable.
_________________
Being a good fighter is One thing. Being a good person is Everything. Kevin "Superkick" McClinton

cross · Black Belt

Personally being that my training is geared towards self protection, i train both. The situation will dictate what position you are in initially, so skills with either side forward are crucial. Although if you are training specifically for competition, it may be more beneficial early on to focus on one side forward and be comfortable with that first.

Menjo · Black Belt

some0ne · Yellow Belt

You start out in one stance and eventually...usually a few years later get proficient in the other stance. Every instructor in the association I learned under(m.t.i.a./"master toddy's")can fight in both stances.
_________________
Karate without bareknuckle kumite(kyokushin/knockdown rules)is dancing. Karate without kata isn't Karate.

BTW, I'm a horrible dancer.

nine_weapons · Orange Belt

1. efficiency. when you are training to fight and fight well against others who are training to beat you, you don't have time to hone everything on both sides.

2. principle. Boxers fight with the power side back - you only have one power side.

if you wish, you can train to switch sides - some do. But the primary stance is power side back.
_________________
My thoughts on martial arts and weight training:

http://www.hesfit.com/men/comment/bodyweight-training-vs-weight-training-a-martial-artists-perspective/

baronbvp · Black Belt

KNOCKuOUT · Orange Belt

Most of the techniques at my school are taught in one stance, but on my own time I try to practice them on both. Most of the basic strikes are taught on both sides however at my school.

	KarateForums.com Forum Index -> Kickboxing, Boxing and Muay Thai	All times are GMT - 6 Hours Goto page 1, 2 Next
Page 1 of 2