Discuss internet community strategy at CommunityAdmins.com
Add Us     Facebook    StumbleUpon
Username:    Password:
Remember Me?    
   I Lost My Password!
Bookmark and Share
Post new topic   Reply to topic    KarateForums.com Forum Index -> Martial Arts and Politics
 See a User Guidelines violation? Press on the post.
Author Message

bushido_man96
KF Sensei
KF Sensei

Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 18754
Location: Hays, KS
Styles: Taekwondo, Combat Hapkido, Aikido, and I research Medieval Combat

PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joe, I like your rewording. Very well thought.

Bob, I think you are on the right track, but you won't necessarily be arrested. You will likely be questioned, for sure, and perhaps be taken to the police station for such questioning, but depending on how things shake out, you wouldn't necessarily end up arrested. You probably know that, but you kind of went worst-case scenario in your post, so thought I would shed a bit more light there.

In the Nov. 09 Black Belt, there is an article titled "Forgotten Realities of Reality-Based Training." In it, the author makes a reference to the need of RBSD instructors (and I think it should fall to all instructors in general) to know the letter of the law for the area and population that they are teaching, and discuss it in classes, and make sure to work into the skill set that they use.

He mentions a case in 2003 in which a man involved in an altercation with 2 men with violent histories. Using what he thought was reasonable force, he stabbed one of the assailants with a pocket knife, and was charged for the death of the man. According to the article, the altercation was "alcohol fueled," and the man was unable to justify his use of force. He was eventually found guilty of voluntary manslaughter, and served 2 years in prison.

So, it isn't always as clear cut as it may seem.
_________________
Success is where preparation meets opportunity.

www.chiefswarpath.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger

sensei8
Black Belt
Black Belt

Joined: 23 Feb 2008
Posts: 1995

Styles: Shindokan Karate-Do [Shuri-te/Okinawa-te based]

PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another twisted question from yours truly.

When does the right of self-defense turn into committing moral turpitude?


_________________
'I' do not hit, but, 'it' hits all by itself!!!

Proof is on the floor!!!

The only easy day was yesterday!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

JusticeZero
Pre-Black Belt
Pre-Black Belt

Joined: 02 Apr 2005
Posts: 955
Location: Anchorage, AK
Styles: Capoeira Angola

PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I generally rule of thumb "If you can run away without abandoning people to danger, then you are no longer defending - you are attacking."
_________________
"Anything worth doing is worth doing badly." - Baleia
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

bushido_man96
KF Sensei
KF Sensei

Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 18754
Location: Hays, KS
Styles: Taekwondo, Combat Hapkido, Aikido, and I research Medieval Combat

PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd say that is just about right, JZ.
_________________
Success is where preparation meets opportunity.

www.chiefswarpath.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger

RichardZ
Brown Belt
Brown Belt

Joined: 03 Nov 2009
Posts: 624


PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to agree with JZ. And if you are defending from within the home, I guess there was no running away.

In short, everything has to be delt with on the basis of common sense and less over-reaction.

If we can deal with somene attacking use, per the situation and circumstance not to maim them, we cannot apply the same common sense and reasoning to not shoot them dead.

The line has to be drawn what is reasonable and excessive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

crazylegs
White Belt
White Belt

Joined: 05 Jun 2010
Posts: 14


PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm glad I live in Florida. We are no longer required to flee. We are legally justified in almost any circumstance as long as there is someone acting agrressively towards us.
I think this how the law should be. I feel that I should have the right to stand my ground. I mean, really, if someone threatens you or pushes you or commits any hostile act, why should anyone care if he gets his butt kicked? Any why should anyone be punished for kicking it? Why give the aggressor rights?
I believe in personal accountability and if some bully gets his butt handed to him he's getting what he deserves imo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

joesteph
Black Belt
Black Belt

Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 2556
Location: Bayonne, NJ USA

PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

crazylegs wrote:

I'm glad I live in Florida. We are no longer required to flee.

So a "duty to retreat" had been in effect, and is now repealed.

Quote:

We are legally justified in almost any circumstance as long as there is someone acting agrressively towards us. . . .

I think you mean legally justified to use force. I imagine the law is clearer that the force has to have some proportion to the threat at hand, but that stands to reason.

Quote:

I mean, really, if someone threatens you or pushes you or commits any hostile act, why should anyone care if he gets his butt kicked? . . .

I follow you about the threatening, pushing, and "any hostile act," Crazylegs, but the part that I italicized, I believe, doesn't properly conclude what you may be wanting to say. Why shouldn't you be able to defend yourself? may be a better conclusion to the three instances you offer.

Quote:

Why give the aggressor rights?

When this argument is brought up, I've found that it's too emotional to be useful. We live in a nation of laws, and those laws are to protect all in our society; even the aggressor/accused has rights by law. However, we have laws that permit the aggressor to be punished in direct proportion to the crime (in this case aggression) committed. That can mean jail time.

Quote:

I believe in personal accountability . . .

Agreed.
_________________
~ Joe

http://www.facebook.com (Lago Martial Arts)
http://www.uwa-martialarts.com (Universal Warrior Arts)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    KarateForums.com Forum Index -> Martial Arts and Politics All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Network: iFroggy Hosting - SportsForums.net - phpBBHacks.com - PhotoshopForums.com - Managing Online Forums - ManagingCommunities.com - CommunityAdmins.com - Bad Boy Blog - SodaRatings.com - Patrick O'Keefe

< Advertising - Contact - Disclosure Policy - Link To Us - Links - Staff - User Guidelines >