|
|
| Author |
Message |
alsey
Purple Belt


Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 501
Location: UK
Styles: shotokan (2nd dan), jujitsu (3rd kyu), kendo (1st dan).
|
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
i'd actually say karate is mostly grappling in its old forms. all real combat styles are mainly about grappling.
but modern karate-do as it is practiced in most schools is for all intents and purposes a striking art. _________________ "Gently return to the simple physical sensation of the breath. Then do it again, and again, and again. Somewhere in this process, you will come face-to-face with the sudden and shocking realization that you are completely crazy. Your mind is a shrieking, gibbering madhouse on wheels." - ven. henepola gunaratana |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bushido_man96
KF Sensei


Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 12924
Location: Hays, KS
Styles: Taekwondo,Hapkido, SCA Combat, and I research Medieval Combat
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 10:37 am Post subject: Shotokan to judo |
|
|
| alsey wrote: |
i'd actually say karate is mostly grappling in its old forms. all real combat styles are mainly about grappling.
but modern karate-do as it is practiced in most schools is for all intents and purposes a striking art. |
I don't know about that. I think that it was probably jiu-jitsu for the most part early on, when it was taught to the samurai as unarmed combat techniques. Later on, when these techniques were not as necessary for combat (advent of the firearm), they started to become more like karate.
Just my theory, though. _________________ Success is where preparation meets opportunity.
www.chiefswarpath.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
juey palancu
Orange Belt

Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 116
Location: Puerto Rico
Styles: Shotokan
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wouldnt say it's mostly grappling, but I would agree with some other posters that traditional karate contains a great deal of grappling applications (Sport karate ussually does not, though, or does not emphasize them). MANY of these grappling applications are right there in the kata. For example, sequences of 2-3 three blocks can be very effectively thought of as one block and subsequent locks and or limb control moves. Most moves done from a kiba-dachi (horse riders' stance) are very effective clinch, throw, and takedown avoidance techniques. The strong hip rotations used in Shotokan and other styles can send an opponent flying through the air if they are sued in a throw! And so on.
If you find a traditional instructor that emphasizes kata and bunkai and you study hard, you can be a good grappler, I assure you. It all depends on the school/instructor, though. If you feel you are not getting good applications on the karate you are learning, find another school.
I train in traditional shotokan and I am REALLY good at avoiding takedowns (i have friends who wrestle and do judo who have found this out after challenging me to stay on my feet against them) and it comes from karate. I have also been known to throw them off their feet, to their surprise! Of course, it shouldnt be a surprise: it is well known that Gichin Funakoshi (Shotokan's founder) was friends and collaborator with Gigoro Cano (Judo's) and that they learned from each other. Similar collaborations happened with other masters and style founders. And so on. Traditional Karate is actually a mixed-martial-art!
two cents,
gero
--------
nidan, Traditional Shotokan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mmljpp
Orange Belt

Joined: 22 Jan 2008
Posts: 110
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shotokan
Pros-Very powerfull strikes
Cans-Very linear Defence=katas
Judo
Pros-Great throws Great Sport
Cans-Sport oriented |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ying&yang
Purple Belt


Joined: 29 Jan 2008
Posts: 513
Location: melbourne
Styles: JKD , and 15 others
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:23 am Post subject: Re: Shotokan to judo |
|
|
| bushido_man96 wrote: |
Shotokan: Pros..kicking and striking, standup sparring, footwork, forms and self-defense applications.
Judo: Pros..takedowns and throwing, ground game, chokes, locks, submissions. |
Yes that is a good explanation. but a mixture would be better  _________________ I think that there is no 1 style , and that to truly become a great martial artist and person you must take information from where ever you can. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MMA_Jim
Yellow Belt

Joined: 05 Dec 2007
Posts: 68
Location: Philadelphia
Styles: BJJ, Muay Thai
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
The differences are obvious:
Karate lacks grappling, plain and simple.
Judo lacks striking, plain and simple.
Many people feel that when you explain the shortcomings of a style, they have to defend said style, especially if is the primary style they train in.
Lots of people will tell you that "true" karate teaches grappling, or that "true" Judo teaches striking.
I've seen what karateka have called grappling, and I've seen what Judoka have called striking. If you want to draw an analogy, karates grappling is about as good as Judo's striking (and vice versa), which is not very good at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
granitemiller
Yellow Belt

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 35
Location: Pittsburgh
Styles: Shotokan
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:27 pm Post subject: comparison |
|
|
Karate Pros: Striking, Kata, Bonkai, Throws
Karate Cons: Grappling
Judo Pros: Grappling, Wrestling, Throws
Judo Cons: Striking, reliance on gi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NightOwl
KF Sempai


Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 987
Location: Japan
Styles: This and that, Rookie Judo
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:19 pm Post subject: Re: comparison |
|
|
| granitemiller wrote: |
Karate Pros: Striking, Kata, Bonkai, Throws
Karate Cons: Grappling
Judo Pros: Grappling, Wrestling, Throws
Judo Cons: Striking, reliance on gi |
Hey now! Gis are quite fashionable  _________________ Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
~Theodore Roosevelt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Throwdown0850
Green Belt


Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 408
Styles: Kodokan Judo, Enshin Karate
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| A good pro for Judo is that we practice with resistance in training and Tourneys.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bushido_man96
KF Sensei


Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 12924
Location: Hays, KS
Styles: Taekwondo,Hapkido, SCA Combat, and I research Medieval Combat
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:35 pm Post subject: Re: Shotokan to judo |
|
|
| ying&yang wrote: |
| bushido_man96 wrote: |
Shotokan: Pros..kicking and striking, standup sparring, footwork, forms and self-defense applications.
Judo: Pros..takedowns and throwing, ground game, chokes, locks, submissions. |
Yes that is a good explanation. but a mixture would be better  |
I don't doubt that. However, the original poster merely asked for the pros and cons for each; that is what I listed. _________________ Success is where preparation meets opportunity.
www.chiefswarpath.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|