Add KarateForums.com
Username:    Password:
Remember Me?    
   I Lost My Password!
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    KarateForums.com Forum Index -> Choosing a Martial Art, Comparing Styles, and Cross-Training
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 See a User Guidelines violation? Press on the post.
Author Message

shuriken_girl
Yellow Belt
Yellow Belt

Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 54
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 2:31 am    Post subject: Soft styles of Kung Fu: More powerful than any hard style? Reply with quote

Soft styles of kung fu use a whipping-like motion of hands and feet that requires little muscle power but supposedly deeply penetrates your opponent.
Raw strength doesn't seem to do this "penetrating" thing.
Do you believe soft styles of kung fu outpower harder styles like panther kung fu or karate etc.?

Please, do not answer if you have no idea what you're talking about. I'm looking for an educated answer from a person who knows something about the theory of soft styles.
_________________
*-----*-----*
Shuriken: art of Japanese blade throwing
Shorin-ryu karate with influences from White Crane Kung Fu
15 years old
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

ckdstudent
Green Belt
Green Belt

Joined: 09 May 2002
Posts: 491
Location: Surrey, England
Styles: Choi Kwang Do

PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 2:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That'd probably be what we call impact shock. I only know a little about soft styles, but I'd have to say that no, they don't overpower hard styles.

A soft style may be able to wind you with a light palm strike, but I've seen people lifted off their feet while holding three inch thick foam shields. They can't really be more powerful than one another, simply because both rely on human strength. A hard style encourages you to put all your strength into a blow, I can't see how (forgive me if I misunderstand here) a style that says you should not use all your strength could overpower one which does.

Overpower I take to mean produce more power with techniques, not win in a fight, that's a different matter entirely.
_________________
---------
Pil Sung
Jimmy B
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger

Kensai
Black Belt
Black Belt

Joined: 05 Jul 2002
Posts: 1415
Location: Britain

PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 4:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I study Aikido, although not a traditional Chinese soft style, it does have a chinese and Japanese heritage.

Soft styles take alot longer to master than there hard style brothers. I think that a good soft stylist would stand a good chance of defeating an equal oppenent of a harder style.

This is my reasoning. As soft styles take a lot less energy, you can keep fighting effectively for a lot longer. The strikes, tend to be more hard hitting, on the inside, Bruce Lee discribe it as getting hit with a chain and a iron ball. IN the soft arts, there are very few blocks, removing the idea that all attacks must be stopped by blocks, allows the soft practioner more movement, attacking an attack, rather than blocking it.

Also, with Aikido, you dont feel the lock, until it is finally applied, so you dont really have that reflex action of quickly removing your arm.

This is only my opiniuon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger

metalhead
Yellow Belt
Yellow Belt

Joined: 11 Jul 2002
Posts: 92
Location: Texas, USA

PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 8:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My Sifu teaches a combination of the styles as you have described them. We begin by learning Shaolin style (hard) to achieve the basics and improve fitness levels. When you have learned the punches, kicks, forms, stances, etc.. and can demonstrate this knowledge only then do you progress to the internal(soft) styles of Tai Chi, Hsing I and Pa Kua.

I do not agree that soft styles require little muscle power. I believe that the power is just applied differently. Hard styles show their power where as the soft styles are more deceptive in approach. The "penetration" thing, as I understand it, comes from proper execution and focused strength.

I hope this makes sense as we are taught this as one system/style and it is difficult to describe in terms of hard and soft. However, everything revolves around conditioning and the proper application of power/strength.

I do not think that one out powers the other because we are taught both as compliments to one another (ie, sometimes you need to go with the flow and sometimes you need to stop the flow).

Again I hope this makes sense and it is only my opinion.
_________________
"Do not assume I share your prejudices"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Iron Arahat
Red Belt
Red Belt

Joined: 08 Aug 2001
Posts: 846
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 9:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Soft styles of kung fu use a whipping-like motion of hands and feet that requires little muscle power but supposedly deeply penetrates your opponent.
Raw strength doesn't seem to do this "penetrating" thing.


The whipping motion will penetrate to do internal damage. Is it better? It is tough to say. However, there are many styles which incorporate both hard and soft, Shaolin being one of them. That I believe has better versatility, than a strictly hard or soft style.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

El Guerrero Loco
Orange Belt
Orange Belt

Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 101


PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2002 9:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How can one say that a soft style is better than a hard style, they may attack in different ways, but the result is ultimatley the same, the destruction of one's opponent. Say my opponent threw a punch, i grabbed his arm, threw the opponent down then slapped on an arm bar, is that better or worse than say an aikidoka who redirects te oponents engery into a throw of his own then slaps on an aikido lock? I'd say their about even, the biggest difference is that harder styles are generally easier to learn but gets weaker with age(like i mean when someone gets old) whereas, with a soft style is takes longer to learn but gets better with age.
_________________
"Live free.
Die well..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Kensai
Black Belt
Black Belt

Joined: 05 Jul 2002
Posts: 1415
Location: Britain

PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2002 4:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry El Guerrero Loco, did not been to sound like Aikido is better than another art, I dont mean that.

I agree with your Analysis of soft and hard MA's at there most basic level there is no difference, they are striving for the destruction of ones opponent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger

shuriken_girl
Yellow Belt
Yellow Belt

Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 54
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2002 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gracias Guerrero...I think you have a good point. Soft styles getting better with age, hard styles being easier to learn.
_________________
*-----*-----*
Shuriken: art of Japanese blade throwing
Shorin-ryu karate with influences from White Crane Kung Fu
15 years old
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

El Guerrero Loco
Orange Belt
Orange Belt

Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 101


PostPosted: Tue Aug 13, 2002 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thx guys, i eat, live, sleep martial arts. I think about it prolly more than anything.
_________________
"Live free.
Die well..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Kensai
Black Belt
Black Belt

Joined: 05 Jul 2002
Posts: 1415
Location: Britain

PostPosted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 4:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am the same, I cant get enough of it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    KarateForums.com Forum Index -> Choosing a Martial Art, Comparing Styles, and Cross-Training All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


< Advertising - Contact - Disclosure Policy - DMCA - Staff - User Guidelines >