Terminology

Nidan Melbourne · KF Sempai

We all use terminology in our dojos that are specific to our style or school, but may be slightly (or outright) different to other styles or schools.

For example: the humble 'Upper Block', to date I have seen two different terms for it "Jodan Uke" and "Age Uke". One meaning Upper Block and the other Rising Block.

For you as instructors, how often do you hear different terms for the techniques that you teach?

JR 137 · Black Belt

My only Japanese is dojo Japanese, so take it as you will...

Regarding jodan uke vs age uke, my understanding is jodan is head or high (in the sense of head), whereas age is rising. We use jodan uke, jodan tsuki, etc.

We have age tsuki in our syllabus, which is translated as rising punch. If you know the Pinan/Heian series of kata, it’s in Pinan 5; at the top of the embusen after the kake dachi and uraken strike. Being Goju Ryu, you probably don’t know Pinan 5, so here’s a video

The 13th count. He did a slow kind of raising of the arm; I learned it as a fast punch held out.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwfbHEZTero

Long story short, IMO jodan uke AND age uke are correct. It all depends on if you want to call it high block or rising block.

I think it’s basically the same for other stuff. I’ve heard the circular block at the end of Sanchin kata called shuto mawashi uke (knife hand circular block), einke mawashi uke (wrist circular block), and shuto einke uke. Which is right? Better question is which is actually wrong.

Then again, if you subscribe to the belief that the blocks aren’t really blocks at all, then calling any of them uke is technically wrong

But that’s another thread. Everything’s gotta be called something.

Spartacus Maximus · Black Belt

This probably varies significantly from place to place but, the Japanese terminology is used often enough for everyone who has been training a few years to have heard it all. It makes things easier and smoother when groups from different branches practise together for an association connected with Okinawa/Japan. Also much more likely to be frequently or exclusively used if one was taught in Japanese or is the direct student of a native instructor who speaks nothing else.

Wastelander · KF Sensei

Most frequently, the interchanging of chudan-soto-uke and chudan-uchi-uke, and their accompanying English terminology.

Chudan-soto-uke = Middle level outside receiver/"block"
Chudan-uchi-uke = Middle level inside receiver/"block"

Now, at first glance, you would not think these could ever be mixed up--one is outside and one is inside, right?

The trouble is that some people name the technique based on the direction it moves (inward, toward the center line, or outward, away from the center line), while other people name the technique based on the part of the arm being used (inside of the wrist or outside of the forearm). This means that one person will call it an "outside middle block" because their arm is moving toward the outside, while another person would call that same movement an "inside middle block" because it is the inside of their wrist that makes contact.

Personally, I believe that those referring to the part of the arm being used should label it as such--either chudan-soto-ude-uke or chudan-uchi-ude-uke, with "ude" meaning "arm." I have seen a few schools do it, but it's not common, probably because it takes so long to say

bushido_man96 · KF Sensei

We use Korean terminology when doing basics and board breaking in our school. I've got a lot of TKD books, and I notice in reading them that the terms we use are different for many of the techniques. Not sure why, as I don't speak a lick of Korean, other than the terms I use in class.
_________________
www.haysgym.com
http://www.sunyis.com/
www.aikidoofnorthwestkansas.com

MatsuShinshii · Black Belt

We use both Uchinaguchi and Japanese in our organization. Why? I guess because my Shinshii might only have known a word or technique in that language and not the other. Either way as the post questioned... yes we have had others join and use a different terminology than what we use.

I think it is quite common. I think the main reason is many instructors get their indoctrination in their chosen arts language inside the Dojo and if their teacher had never been to that country nor speaks the language themselves then misunderstanding meaning is easy to do. Thus you have one instructor calling something one thing and another calling it something else.

If you want to know if you're right take a trip to your arts origins and seek out an instructor. They will correct you and you will know the proper terminology for your arts techniques.
_________________
The person who succeeds is not the one who holds back, fearing failure, nor the one who never fails-but the one who moves on in spite of failure.
Charles R. Swindoll

Spartacus Maximus · Black Belt

The further one is from the source language of whatever one practises, the more likely are misinterpretations and errors in terminology usage.

DWx · Black Belt

Wastelander · KF Sensei

Spartacus Maximus · Black Belt

The same thing happens with karate. In Okinawa, the “uke” techniques are named by where the movement ends instead of where it begins like in many dojo abroad. These were reversed so that a basic chudan soto uke referred to the one with the “blocking” arm making contact with the outer side of the forearm. For uchi uke the contact arm ends at the opposite shoulder and contact is made with the inner side. Very confusing at first.

	KarateForums.com Forum Index -> Instructors and School Owners	All times are GMT - 6 Hours Goto page 1, 2 Next
Page 1 of 2