Add KarateForums.com
Username:    Password:
Remember Me?    
   I Lost My Password!
Post new topic   Reply to topic    KarateForums.com Forum Index -> Karate
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 See a User Guidelines violation? Press on the post.
Author Message

sensei8
KF Sensei
KF Sensei

Joined: 23 Feb 2008
Posts: 16386
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Styles: Shindokan Saitou-ryu [Shuri-te/Okinawa-te based]

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's nothing wrong with just labeling it "Karate"!! After all, it was "Karate", and that was important enough to convey their intent. Who cares if it was Shotokan or Bozokan or any other style of "Karate"??

What Shizentai's post speaks about is direct and to the very point, imho. The layperson see's the MA as Karate, no matter the style, so why confuse the layperson with styles!?! To that layperson, Shotokan and Goju-ryu, for example, might appear the same with a shrug of their shoulders.

Let's not forget, many MA schools simply blaze the word "KARATE" on their window front no matter the actual style of the MA that's being taught inside. For example, if I put Shindokan Saitou-ryu Karate and Kobudo on my window front, the layperson is more than likely only going to focus on the one word...KARATE...and disregard the others because they understand the word, KARATE!!

I'm sure that's what my mom saw when she enrolled me in a Karate school; forbade the other words entirely, focusing only on that one word...KARATE!!






_________________
**Proof is on the floor!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

JR 137
Black Belt
Black Belt

Joined: 10 May 2015
Posts: 2442
Location: In the dojo
Styles: Seido Juku

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sensei8 wrote:
There's nothing wrong with just labeling it "Karate"!! After all, it was "Karate", and that was important enough to convey their intent. Who cares if it was Shotokan or Bozokan or any other style of "Karate"??

What Shizentai's post speaks about is direct and to the very point, imho. The layperson see's the MA as Karate, no matter the style, so why confuse the layperson with styles!?! To that layperson, Shotokan and Goju-ryu, for example, might appear the same with a shrug of their shoulders.

Let's not forget, many MA schools simply blaze the word "KARATE" on their window front no matter the actual style of the MA that's being taught inside. For example, if I put Shindokan Saitou-ryu Karate and Kobudo on my window front, the layperson is more than likely only going to focus on the one word...KARATE...and disregard the others because they understand the word, KARATE!!

I'm sure that's what my mom saw when she enrolled me in a Karate school; forbade the other words entirely, focusing only on that one word...KARATE!!







Exactly. Couldn’t agree more. Furthermore, even non-Karate places use the term karate. I’ve seen it used many times with TKD and Tang Soo Do. I understand it used to be referred to as “Korean Karate,” but call it what is is, either TKD or TSD.

I don’t understand how JKA or any other actual karate organization simply using the term Karate is wrong. Would a car dealership be incorrect in having a sign that says “Cars?” A restaurant with a sign that says “Food?” A pet store that says “Pets?” Sure, being more descriptive might bring in more people who want what a specific thing and less people will turn away because they were expecting something else, but being generic in the description is far from incorrect.

Being too generic can have its downfalls. If I saw a sign that simply said food, I probably wouldn’t go in because I’d have no idea what to expect from the menu. But if I’m looking for a new option, I might do a bit more research on that restaurant.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Prototype
Green Belt
Green Belt

Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Posts: 367


PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:26 pm    Post subject: Re: Why did they call a Shotokan promo, Karate only? Reply with quote

Shizentai wrote:
Prototype wrote:
JKA is not a style of Karate even though it's exclusively a Shotokan organization. An inference a layman would not be able to make. As for the other Karate styles during that time, Wado Ryu was prevalent and bares little resemblence to Shotokan.

Any Taekwondo style is closer to Shotokan than Wado Ryu is to Shotokan


Yes, but there is nothing to infer unless you ARE savvy. It's like pointing at a hawk and saying "that's a bird." It's not wrong. It's a hawk, and it's a bird. Both are correct, and there is no obligation to stipulate that it is a hawk if you're talking to someone who doesn't know the word "bird" yet.

A "layman" now and what a "layman" was 65 years ago are very different. While the video is very technical, the voiceover was clearly aimed at an American audience that was not very savvy. Americans had to be told why they should care about karate in the first place, before they could be expected to listen up long enough to learn about the different ryu and organizations. This was the former, not the later.

Despite your obvious disliking of shotokan (not sure why), it is karate. Similarly, if someone was doing wadoryu and called it karate in a documentary, they would also be correct for doing so. Are you're suggesting that shotokan should not be called "karate"?


I don't don't dislike Shotokan. However, Shotokan and Kyokushin are about as similar to each other in level of intensity as "generic military training" and Navy Seals. Granted, Shotokan was not yet named, so that naturally answers my question. But I don't think it would be a Shotokan labelled promo anyway, even if Funakoshi was dead when it was made.

The first thing you learn when starting martial art, whether you know anything or not, is which style you train. I don't think it would be too hard for the viewer to grasp that they are watching one very specific branch of Karate by Gishin Funakoshi.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

shortyafter
Orange Belt
Orange Belt

Joined: 17 Nov 2016
Posts: 169

Styles: Kyokushinkai, Shotokan

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Why did they call a Shotokan promo, Karate only? Reply with quote

Prototype wrote:

I don't don't dislike Shotokan. However, Shotokan and Kyokushin are about as similar to each other in level of intensity as "generic military training" and Navy Seals. Granted, Shotokan was not yet named, so that naturally answers my question. But I don't think it would be a Shotokan labelled promo anyway, even if Funakoshi was dead when it was made.

My experience and knowledge would agree that training in Kyokushin
is generally more intense, but that really depends on the dojo and instructor. Also depends on which day you train within the very same set of dojos. Also depends on how you define intense. In any case, I'm not sure how that really changes the issue. Regardless of the intensity level they are still very much the same art, especially in the eyes of a layman.

As I said before, I am a beginner in both but what I have learned in each style is absolutely valuable when it comes to training in the other. I'm sure as you train up the differences may be more pronounced, but on a fundamental level they are very much the same art which is karate.

Prototype wrote:
The first thing you learn when starting martial art, whether you know anything or not, is which style you train. I don't think it would be too hard for the viewer to grasp that they are watching one very specific branch of Karate by Gishin Funakosh.

Not nowadays in the age of the internet, and 30-50 years since karate has become an art that is known and practiced worldwide. But here we're talking about a video produced in the 1950's for a largely ignorant American audience...

I have to agree that you seem to dislike Shotokan, or else I can't really see the need to make this argument. As others have said, to me it's all karate.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

JR 137
Black Belt
Black Belt

Joined: 10 May 2015
Posts: 2442
Location: In the dojo
Styles: Seido Juku

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If it was a Kung fu demo, would you be upset if they didn’t mention which type of Kung fu?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

MatsuShinshii
Black Belt
Black Belt

Joined: 15 Aug 2016
Posts: 1423
Location: Kentucky
Styles: Machimura Suidi Rokudan, Ryukyu Kenpo, Kobudo, Judo

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well to me it's blatantly obvious that it's Japanese Karate. If the to choices you give us are between Kyokushin and Shotokan, again I think it's obvious what style is highlighted in the video.

To me there is a pretty stark difference between the two styles.
_________________
The person who succeeds is not the one who holds back, fearing failure, nor the one who never fails-but the one who moves on in spite of failure.
Charles R. Swindoll
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

OneKickWonder
Purple Belt
Purple Belt

Joined: 17 Feb 2018
Posts: 513

Styles: Tang soo do

PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 3:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How old is the video? It looks pretty old. The narration sounds kinda of 1950s era. The video is old cinematograph film footage.

In that kind of era, karate was shotokan.

Of course, plenty will point out there are other styles and always have been. But the term karate was coined by Gichin Funakoshi in the early 1900s. Funakoshi formalised various similar styles, packaged it up under the label of kara-te-do, later just karate, and sold it to the Japanese public and then the rest of the world.

So why not mention other styles? Probably quite simply that any spin off styles at the time the original video was made would still be in their infancy and pretty much unheard of.

As a kind of interesting aside, there should be no such style as shotokan. Funakoshi never called his karate by that name. It comes from a hand painted sign his students made without asking. I'm not sure of the exact translation but it's something like 'the master's house'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

JR 137
Black Belt
Black Belt

Joined: 10 May 2015
Posts: 2442
Location: In the dojo
Styles: Seido Juku

PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OneKickWonder wrote:
How old is the video? It looks pretty old. The narration sounds kinda of 1950s era. The video is old cinematograph film footage.

In that kind of era, karate was shotokan.

Of course, plenty will point out there are other styles and always have been. But the term karate was coined by Gichin Funakoshi in the early 1900s. Funakoshi formalised various similar styles, packaged it up under the label of kara-te-do, later just karate, and sold it to the Japanese public and then the rest of the world.

So why not mention other styles? Probably quite simply that any spin off styles at the time the original video was made would still be in their infancy and pretty much unheard of.

As a kind of interesting aside, there should be no such style as shotokan. Funakoshi never called his karate by that name. It comes from a hand painted sign his students made without asking. I'm not sure of the exact translation but it's something like 'the master's house'.


Shoto was Funakoshi’s pen name. It means waving pines. Shotokan means Shoto’s house/ house of shoto.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    KarateForums.com Forum Index -> Karate All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


< Advertising - Contact - Disclosure Policy - DMCA - Staff - User Guidelines >