|
Author |
Message |
unDertow
Yellow Belt
Joined: 13 Aug 2001
Posts: 30
Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2001 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
What i meant about the blocking was that if you are fast enough to block a straight on punch you should have no problem seeing a haymaker coming. You should deal with them differently but to a martial artisr with any kind of experience a haymaker should be no problem |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SBN Doug
KF VIP
Joined: 04 Nov 2001
Posts: 3767
Location: Houston, TX
Styles: Kuk Sool Won
|
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2003 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's another old thread I enjoyed. I like how it shows more the positive aspects of TKD and the incorporation of self defense.
Not being TKD, it might not be fair for me to say that we spend a large amount of time on locking, trapping, falling etc. However, I would like to hear more about your schools. _________________ Kuk Sool Won - 4th dan
Evil triumphs when good men do nothing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karatekid1975
KF VIP
Joined: 26 Mar 2002
Posts: 4588
Location: Upstate NY
Styles: Tang Soo Do/TKD/jujitsu
|
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2003 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, I don't think one-steps are enough. Not the way they are taught in my dojang. I just learned one that you do three hand techniques and switch stance all three times. To me, that isn't realistic. The hand techniques used are cool (punch, punch, palm heel strike), but I think if we stayed in more of a "natural back stance," and fire off the hand techniques quickly, it would be better. Specially if they concentrate more on using "hip" than trying to switch stance all the time.
One steps aren't made to be "self defense." They teach distance and all (so I'm told). But I feel they should, at least, be a bit more realistic. _________________ Laurie F |
|
Back to top |
|
|
OldRookie
Orange Belt
Joined: 16 Mar 2002
Posts: 130
Location: NE Texas
Styles: Tae Kwon Do (Choong Sil)
|
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2003 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laurie-I gotta go with you on this. At my Dojang one steps are learned by lower ranking colored belts & are part of testing, but....as a tool for self defense,Nahhh......just my opinion of course. I personally think sparring helps to a greater degree & its fun! Unfortunately, in the "real world" I don't think the attacker will have pads on Or help you up after he/she clocks you! _________________ *1st Dan Oct 2004*
"Progress lies not enhancing what is, but in advancing toward what will be."
"It is better to deserve honors and not have them than to have them and not deserve them." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karatekid1975
KF VIP
Joined: 26 Mar 2002
Posts: 4588
Location: Upstate NY
Styles: Tang Soo Do/TKD/jujitsu
|
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2003 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
LOL I agree. _________________ Laurie F |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AndrewGreen
Pre-Black Belt
Joined: 20 Aug 2002
Posts: 905
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Styles: Crazy Penguin Ninjitsu
|
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2003 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
One steps are quit useless beyond introducing basic technique. Take another activity, let's say football.
Now apply the same teaching method. We create a bunch of plays, map out what everyone does, when they do it, and how they do it. Then rehearse. Never actually playing the game, or even watching others play and learning from them, afterall they are missing out on the "art".
Are we now ready to play against another team?
Or do we create drills which isolate specific skills to develop them then work them, against each other, not planned out, (who what when and how for everyone) just isolating a specific element
and then actually play the game for practice. _________________
Andrew Green
http://innovativema.ca - All the top martial arts news!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|