Two part question: Backfist vs jab, and Karate blocks

SonGoku92 · White Belt

Backfist IMHO is not really an attack one can use all the time. but as with any technique has its place. I try to use it a little closer than most people because if a stretched out backfist is blocked it tends to cause problems for me. but thats just me. but I tend to have my own version of everything. lol
_________________
"I am the hope of the universe! I am the answer to all living things that cry out for peace,I am protector of the innocent, I am the light in the darkness, I am truth... Ally to good! nightmare to you!"

infinitehand · Yellow Belt

The backfist is a great technique. Not to be seen as better or worse than a jab. It all depends on how you train it. Find a guy who can't keep his hands up a back fist works every time. Get a guy to drop his hands a backfist works every time. It appears to me that many people see it as a "tag your it" technique. Well if that's how you train it that's all it will do. If you train it to drop people that's what it will do. It's great off angles and its great to set something up. But if you don't like it you probably won't use it and this won't develope which is no problem.

The traditional blocks used as commonly misunderstood "blocks" probably won't help you at all because except in the rarest cases or "modified shortened" versions traditional karate blocks don't work at all. But then again, I personally don't think there are any blocks in Karate. If you like Shotokan but don't want to give up knockdown fighting see if some of your dojo mates want to train that way with you in whatever time you have available. Also you can still compete and such.
_________________
"Karate is about digging deeper, not climbing higher."

guird · Orange Belt

The problem with the backfist for the goal you're trying to accomplish is that it doesn't work with gloves. in kickboxing/mma it won't have much effect because it uses the small surface area of the back of the knuckle to strike a weak point such as the temple.
more of a precision strike than a powerful one.

That said, the spinning backfist has made a few, fairly succesful appearances in MMA.

The traditional blocks, done traditionally are pretty useless I have to agree, and even more so in MMA. a lot of them are more intended to break out of someone's grip, etc, some are meant to double as a hammerfist or forearm strike.

However, merits exist. blocking with a twist of the forearm is a very quick, efficient way to block that leaves a relatively small opening while still forcing the punch away. it has more of a place in mma, which has smaller gloves than in (kick)boxing.

Zaine · Black Belt

Tradition blocks generally turn out to be strikes. I would disagree with calling them useless. Generally Martial Arts (whichever it may be) don't teach "useless" techniques.
_________________
Martial arts training is 30% classroom training, 70% solo training.

https://www.instagram.com/nordic_karate/

guird · Orange Belt

I just started reading this guy's stuff.

http://dandjurdjevic.blogspot.nl/2008/06/why-blocks-do-work.html

It isn't shotokan, but it's relevant. by his argument, karate blocks won't do you much good in (kick) boxing, but may be quite helpful in MMA.

sensei8 · KF Sensei

bushido_man96 · KF Sensei

guird · Orange Belt

Sensei 8,

yes, that is his point and I agree. block is a poor translation for uke , parry matches it better, though not perferctly.

infinitehand · Yellow Belt

Receive. Receive is what Uke means
_________________
"Karate is about digging deeper, not climbing higher."

sensei8 · KF Sensei

	KarateForums.com Forum Index -> Choosing a Martial Art, Comparing Styles, and Cross-Training	All times are GMT - 6 Hours Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
Page 2 of 3